An Indian court has rejected an appeal challenging the ban on Telegram, allowing restrictions on the messaging platform to remain in place.
The appeal had sought to overturn government measures that limited access to Telegram, arguing that the ban affected users' ability to communicate and access information. However, the court ruled that the authorities acted within their legal powers.
Government officials have argued that the restrictions were imposed due to concerns related to security, unlawful activities, and the misuse of the platform by criminal networks.
Supporters of the ban say it is necessary to protect public safety and national security, while critics contend that such measures can affect freedom of expression and digital rights.
Legal experts note that the ruling highlights the ongoing debate in India over how governments should regulate social media and messaging platforms while balancing security concerns with civil liberties.
The decision means that Telegram will continue to face the existing restrictions unless a higher court overturns the ruling or the government changes its position.
The case has attracted significant attention from technology companies, digital rights groups, and users who are closely watching how India manages the regulation of online platforms.