Analysts and Iran experts argue that the recent military strikes on Iran ordered by Donald Trump, and carried out alongside Israel, appear to benefit Israel’s strategic goals more than those of the United States, despite Washington’s stated reasons for acting.
Critics note that Trump’s decision represents a sharp shift from his earlier foreign policy rhetoric, during which he criticised interventionist wars and emphasised avoiding prolonged conflicts in the Middle East. The latest operation, however, has largely aligned with the longstanding security agenda of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has repeatedly framed Iran as an “existential threat” to his country and pushed for strong pressure or military action against Tehran.
Several experts told Al Jazeera that the campaign reflects decades of Israeli lobbying rather than a strictly American strategic interest, arguing that Israel has consistently sought deeper military pressure on Iran. They described the conflict as “another Israeli war” being fought with US involvement, a situation that contrasts with most Americans’ views, as public opinion polls show limited support for a distant war with Iran.
Analysts also contend that the strikes have undermined recent diplomatic efforts, with timing that appeared to blur the line between military escalation and cut-off negotiations, potentially serving Israeli interests while leaving broader US policy goals unresolved