The killing of Abu Shabab, one of the key figures resisting Israel’s military operations in Gaza, has sparked renewed debate about the long-term goals and failures of Israel’s ongoing campaign. Analysts say his death, rather than weakening the resistance, may further expose the shortcomings of Israel’s strategy in the enclave. Many believe that eliminating individual leaders cannot resolve the deeper political and humanitarian crisis caused by the conflict.
Abu Shabab was widely known for his influence within Gaza’s network of local defence groups. His ability to mobilise fighters and maintain public support made him a major obstacle to Israel’s plans. Despite Israel’s efforts to dismantle armed resistance, the continued emergence of new commanders shows that the movement is far from collapsing. His death is therefore seen as another chapter in a cycle that military force alone cannot break.
Observers argue that Israel’s strategy heavily relies on assassinations and large-scale military operations, yet these actions have repeatedly failed to bring lasting stability. Instead, the destruction of homes, civilian deaths, and humanitarian blockades have generated more anger and strengthened anti-Israel sentiments within Gaza. With each targeted killing, resentment among Palestinians grows, making Israel’s long-term objectives harder to achieve.
Furthermore, the humanitarian situation in Gaza continues to deteriorate. Lack of food, medicine, and shelter has pushed the population into deeper suffering, raising global concerns about human rights violations. International organisations insist that no military plan can succeed in a territory where millions are struggling to survive. They warn that continued military pressure without political dialogue is unsustainable.
In summary, analysts say Abu Shabab’s death highlights the failure of Israel’s approach and the impossibility of achieving its goals through force alone. As long as the underlying political conflict remains unaddressed, and Gaza’s humanitarian crisis worsens, Israel’s strategy will continue to face resistance and international criticism. Many believe the situation will only change through negotiations, not through military operations.