Military analysts argue that Moscow’s much-hyped nuclear-powered missile project offers little that’s new, citing technological and safety concerns that may outweigh its strategic value.
Defense experts have dismissed claims that Russia’s new nuclear-powered missile represents a major technological breakthrough, describing it instead as an old idea revived with modern hype.
According to reports from military analysts, the weapon, reportedly capable of staying airborne for extended periods and evading missile defense systems, relies on concepts first explored during the Cold War. They argue that the project poses significant safety risks and offers little strategic advantage compared to existing technologies.
Experts noted that the missile’s design may involve a small nuclear reactor used to power its engine, allowing for long-range capabilities. However, they warn that such systems are unstable and could cause radioactive contamination if they malfunction or crash.
Western intelligence agencies have expressed skepticism about Russia’s ability to develop the weapon safely and deploy it effectively. Despite Moscow’s claims that the project shows its technological superiority, analysts believe it serves more as a political signal than a military game-changer.
One defense researcher commented, “It’s an impressive idea on paper, but in reality, it’s risky, outdated, and unlikely to transform global military balance.”